1
Is Beauty beyond the Boundary?
The Beastly Nature of Evangelical Theology
Paper presented at the Evangelical Theological Society Convention
Colorado Springs, CO, November 16, 2001
© 2001 T. Chris Crain
St. Louis University
Evangelical systematic theology is beastly. Such a statement is bound to raise the
eyebrows, if not the ire, of many a theologian. But what does it mean to describe
evangelical theology as "beastly?" Does it mean that evangelical theology is brawny,
bursting with power and vitality like a lion? Or does it mean that evangelical theology is
ugly like a toad? In this paper it means that evangelical theology has neglected one
aspect of the triumvirate of transcendentals: truth, goodness, and beauty. Evangelicals
have done well in defending the truths of the faith--the innerancy of Scripture, the virgin
birth, the resurrection, the incarnation, and the miracles of our Lord. Books abound on
the trustworthiness of the Word vis-à-vis many current issues (e.g., the stiff attack on the
Jesus Seminar). Evangelicals have also excelled in touting what is good about the faith
and what good the faithful should pursue. Though surveys may show that Evangelicals
are no different in terms of morality than your ordinary American (e.g., the divorce rate),
there is no dearth of Evangelical books broaching ethical issues. But when it comes to
speaking about beauty in a systematic, theological manner Evangelicals are silent and this
silence renders by default evangelical theology beastly.
It is my conviction that beauty is part of being and thus reflects the nature of God.
Just as God is truth and speaks truly and just as he is good and acts justly, so is he beauty
and thus he communicates beautifully. God is Beauty and thus things can be beautiful.
God's self-communication of beauty can follow many avenues. The form of God's self-
communication in creation has the quality of beauty. That is, the created world, coming