Barrick, The Authorship of Deuteronomy 34
ETS Annual Meeting, November 14-16, 2001
13
Diagram 5: Deuteronomy 34:10-12
)yÛibæn {ífq-)×olºw 34.10
dOÖ(
lÙ")fr:&éy:B
hÕe$om:K
hêfwhºy OØ(fdºy üre$A)
;{y×infP-le) {yÙinfP
{yèit:pOMahºw tOðto)ífh-lfk:l 34.11
hêfwhºy üOxfl:$ rÜe$A)
tOÙ&A(al
{éyÕfr:cim jerØe):B
hÛo(:rap:l
wyÙfdfbA(-lfk:lU
;O×c:ra)-lfk:lU
hêfqæzAxah dØfYah ülok:lU 34.12
lOÕdfGah )ØfrOMah lÙok:lU
hêe$om hØf&f( üre$A)
;l×")fr:&éy-lfK yÙ"ny"(:l
[10]
A prophet has not arisen in Israel like Moses whom Yahweh knew face to
face.
[11]
miracles that Yahweh sent him to perform in the land of Egypt before Pharaoh, all his
servants, and all his country.
[12]
A prophet has not arise in Israel like Moses in regard to
all the display of power and the great awe that Moses produced in the sight of all Israel.
)yÛibæn {ífq-)×olºw 34.10
dOÖ(
lÙ")fr:&éy:B
hÕe$om:K
hêfwhºy OØ(fdºy üre$A)
63
Driver claimed that the phraseology of vv. 11-12 is Deuteronomic and that "their imperfect connexion
with v.
10
makes it improbable that they are the work of D; they are rather the work of a later (and inferior)
Deut. Writer, who sought to supplement v.
10
by a notice of particulars in which it seemed to him to be
deficient" (Deuteronomy, 425). But, cf. Frevel's assessment of the syntax (225 and 227).
64
The phraseology is similar to Deut 13:2 (
)yibæn !:B:riq:B {Uqæy-yiK).